← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/28366/2023disposed of

Mohd.Khalid v. State Of Haryana And Others

2023-12-16Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP--28366 -2023 (O&M) Decided on : 16.12.2023 Mohd. Khalid . . .Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others . . . Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI PRESENT: Mr. Mazlish Khan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Middha, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. **** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (Oral) 1.

In the present petition, the grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner should be considered in the reserved category of outstanding sportsperson (BCB) for the post of Taxation Inspector as advertisement vide advertisement No. 11/2015 dated 01.12.2015.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has fulfilled all the requisite terms and conditions to compete in the reserved category of outstanding sportsperson (BCB) category, but the claim of the petitioner has not been considered by the respondents in an arbitrary manner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner has already raised the said grievance in the representation dated 05.09.2023 (Annexure P-10) but the same is still pending consideration with the respondents and the petitioner will be satisfied, at this stage, in case a direction is issued to the respondents to decide the same by passing an appropriate speaking order in a time bound manner. 3.

Notice of motion.

4.

On the asking of the Court, Mr. Pankaj Middha, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and submits that in case, the representation RIYA 2023.12.18 17:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP--28366 -2023 (O&M) -22023:PHHC:

161732 dated 05.09.2023 (Annexure P-10) has been received in the office of the concerned authorities and the same is still pending consideration with the authorities concerned, the same will be decided by the competent authority within a period of eight weeks of the receipt of certified copy of this order by passing an appropriate speaking order.

5.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that keeping in view the statement of learned State counsel, the present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further. 6.

Ordered accordingly.

(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE 16.12.2023 Riya Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No RIYA 2023.12.18 17:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document