← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/64292/2023allowed

Major Singh v. State Of Punjab

2024-05-30Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra8 pages

 ()

/ HE HIGH COURT FOR THE IN TH E STATES OF PUNJAB AND HANDIGARH HARYANA AT CH *+ +, 0 

 12.  )("(3" ( 

 

"""

 - ..

.

 

   

""".4 1      & 

 !

"

#$%&!

  &  % Mr. 0  %+   -" Mr. A. S. Samra, AAG, Punja ab.   %'

#"



1    

%"

"



 

   ! " #$"   

     )*+2 34  & &  & & *%"  5%5"  "%  %$ '"$(

 "  

" $  1      

       

"   (  $ )*+(  ""   , (     $$      ""  "     

"  %"3 & -  (

  - 

./ / 6 * 

   - $  (   *  ( - - (  $$7"7( 

      1    "   " $  (  (    "

"   %"    8    $  "  $      9%"  (- :(   "

  -

"       1  (   "  

" $   ,"           $

*- "  -  $  "" ;

5 -       "  

"  -    

     $     "  %"     " $ " $  * $   "     $   

$$      (  "  "$      (    -     -  (" - " " $

 " *        

 

            

 

         

   

)    

                 !     

     

                    " #$      %&                            ' 

                       ' 

 

     &'                

   

                      " ( )             

      

         

     

        &   #   

 

   !     

           " *+      &            

     

       (,# (,* (-* (-. (/# (0# (0( (0* (01 (0- (0.  (0/ (00 *,, *,# *(- **0 *10*-, 

 2   *1   /-,          

           !               !      

       

         

" 1$   &  # (

            &   *   

          "3 1  "  0$   ,  "  $ "   "  " 



" $ "%" "  $ " $ 7 1$- " $$$

 

 !""#  $ %&'( 

 

 !""#  $ %&'(  )* 

+  !,-'./00&&(    1

  2   ! '../ #  3$ 4, 5#6 '70( 8  8   

*)  !'.&.# 3$&( 9,

5 ) !""46#4# 600.(  

 !4:56 "'% 46  #   4 6 '&&( , 9

 

  5 )   !"'04/6#4# 6%%"(;

 8 

<   =  !'.70 # 3$ '0&(   

 !'.% # 3$.&%( 1   

2   ('../# 3$'70 

< !'.%%# 3$0' 

1  ( ( -" $ $$< .6"(

   "  "   " $        (      ""  .6 1 $           ($(( "  ""  $     (   "   /"$ ,(- : -"       " $  .

6 .6 1  "   " $   $  " " ": 1$

$ "       "   ""  $     (   - " /"   "

3 .-6 1    "  

" $  " " $" 

 " " " %"$   3"  $" "  " $ .-68  (" "

" $ "     "" "  "   " $

7   " $     

  .-61" $ $  (  %"  .6   

 ) " 

" $  "

$" "

"   (  -   ("  ""  =$ /$" "

$(""" $" " ""(-  "

 " $ / $ " "       1  

"  .6  ."6  %"  .6.6      "0"-0"-("$( 

-  " " $   $ " - 8 "

 " $    ( ""  "("""     -

 " $     (  "     "    "   

" $$ /$" "  $("""  $" " ""(- $ " "        

" $  $    "

  

" $    "

 (    ( 

" $  (  .-6%$-" "

      $  "  

" $ 

 .-6 1    " $   $:  $( " $(

 " $ "%"

.6.6

%"$(

 "  "" --"$ - "$ ( " $ ( "

 ./61" "%" .6   "   " $    "  $

  "$ "(" " >  ?" $ "   

 & 5

 -"  ( "  """$" "  " -  

"    " " $ 

;

,(-   

; $

-

 "" ( " $(/" 

;     "  

"      

;("$ ( ( ?$ "

"   ,"$("  -  -%" .

6  (" " $ 3  -""$  " " $("$  + " " " Gurappa Gugal and others Vs. State of Mysore : 1969 CriLJ 826 and Shokat Ali Vs. State of Haryna : 2020(2) RCR (Criminal) 339.  10.

Further, a perusal of order dated 12.12.2015 reveals that when the matter was taken up on that date, the proclamation was received back

5 executed, however, since the period of 30 days had not elapsed, the matter was adjourned to 23.12.2015 awaiting the appearance of the petitioner. However, while adjourning the case to 23.12.2015, the trial Court failed to consider the fact that " -/$

$

0 " " $( " 

(" " " $ "   (   3    +"   "/ "  $   

 4:56!"'%46 #  4 6'&&

 :

(*  -$(" "$")*+( "$   ("  -* 4

& #

  * -

)*+ 1  """



  ("     $   $$     ,(-"( ( $-$ ""  @- (- $:"$     ( ""  $ 2  #   @/    -"  "7(7 " $     (  -  (

       "  " 

$   " - " 

  "    ""  ""  $    "  " 

(" " $ " "     ( + " "/" " *

 !"'0 ## >4:56&&0

6

""   -(   "  $  - 

  ($ 

 

 !" #$"  

   )*+2 34 & & %" & *%" 5%5"   "%%$'"$(



 "   " $    (   " 

"$

,(- "  "" (    / (:  0"      "       %"   * " "    "           $  0"  "   0"             

  """""( (

2  -" 

"   ""   "" 

 $/        /        $       """  $

;

1   

"           $  30.05.2024 (MANISHA BATRA) 

JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No