Union Of India And Others v. Kanwaljit Singh And Another
!
"#$# % & '
( )* + %# % !
%,#
%,
- .$
// # # % .$ 0 .$1$ %3 45#
6#%7-
%,
% - .
// $8 %, % $ '& 9: '/ 6 6 '
6
9: '/ 6 2 '
6 '
6
/ :
!
"# !"!!
$% & '
!& * +(
, $
- +( .' / (
!
0
)
%
)
"1
2
4 (
# 0
/ /
(
)
#"5
6
(
)
8
/
) 9
( / % ( 2
res integra
) 4.(
!" # /
4.(
/
/
) +
":
) $'
1;7 < pari materia
=#
)
1;
;
4.(
& "19) In view of the principles of interpretation relating to Casus Omissus, we find that a reading of the Regulations does not lead to an inference that the service element should be
limited to an individual who has completed minimum 15 years of engagement. Regulation 78 cannot be read into Regulation 105B when no such qualification is provided in Regulation 105B."
:
0
(
=
) 9
$%
! &
'('' )* +
, - .!
!1 "
!"!3
!3""">& & , /
/
( 9
?
, /
/ 9
8& 17:& !"!3
@ A
( /
@ A
/ /
"
0
(
(
(
(
) 6
=#
1;
!
B / )
!
"# !"!!
$% & '
(
/
)
#
) /
)
6 '
6
'
( )* +
2 '
harsha
8 6> C 8