Sunil Kumar And ANR v. State Of Punjab And Another

CRM-M-64876-2023 -12024:PHHC:112408

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-64876-2023 Date of decision: 30.08.2024 SUNIL KUMAR AND ANR

...Petitioners

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. S. SHEKHAWAT Present:- Mr. Devyansh, Advocate for Mr. Dinesh Kumar Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Deepinder Brar, Sr. DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Abhishek Pundir, Advocate for Mr. Raju Arora Rana, Advocate for the complainant.

**** N. S. SHEKHAWAT, J. (Oral) The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of an FIR No. 0041 dated 04.05.2023 under Sections 406, 420 and 120-B of IPC registered at Police Station Anaj Mandi, District Patiala (Annexure P-1) alongwith all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 22.05.2023 (Annexure P-2). Vide order dated 01.08.2024 while issuing notice of motion, this Court had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Magistrate for getting their statements recorded with respect to the compromise dated 22.05.2023 (Annexure P-2).

Pursuant to aforesaid order, the parties have appeared before the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Patiala and got their statements recorded. Report dated 21.08.2024 has been received whereby after recording the MAMTA 2024.08.30 16:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment

CRM-M-64876-2023 -22024:PHHC:112408 statements of the parties, the Court below has shown its satisfaction that the compromise is genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence. I have heard counsel for the parties and gone through the case file. In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court below and considering the offence for which the accused have been charged are not of serious nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out the differences for betterment of future life of the parties and also in view of the law laid down in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the present petition for quashing the FIR is allowed qua the petitioners.

Resultantly, FIR No. 0041 dated 04.05.2023 under Sections 406, 420 and 120-B of IPC registered at Police Station Anaj Mandi, District Patiala (Annexure P-1) alongwith all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioners.

(N. S. SHEKHAWAT) 30.08.2024 JUDGE M.Sikka Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No MAMTA 2024.08.30 16:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment