Parwinder Singh v. State Of Punjab
!" !#"$%&'%(%% % %) % ) *+, -
%. /0 %1 )2
% !#"$%&
!% !3&42 $"2
% 2%&% %
! Mr. Viney Saini, Advocate for the complainant.
"""
% 2%&% %/$5!%46 # $%& ' '
() *!+, !-.
+,/ 0
17.11.2023 Women, Mohali, District SAS Nagar Under Sections 406, 498-A, 323 and 506 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'IPC') 1 2
+,- * )
$34$5&. ,'! - !*
2 ) )) ) - - ! 1367 )) * - ) * ) * ) !) * ! - *)8) ) ) * ! ! -* )9 * ! ) ) * !(8- * ) * !
) ) - **
0 1:.%3( - !* * 1313; <
=!*
- ) - * *
!* * ! * ()) ) ) +, ) ) !0 ) )
%1%:34 ,' ! % # !* ) ! )!* * , - ) - - )*
)- ))- - ) - -
) +,- !
, !
* )
) > *
-) $ , 6&61131% - ) *! - )
! !- 8- '' ! 5.
Learned State counsel has submitted that the petitioner has joined the investigation in this case on 22.12.2023. Learned counsel for the complainant has, however, submitted that recovery of several gold articles are yet to be effected from the petitioner and therefore, he has argued that his custodial interrogation is still required and he does not deserve to be granted concession of pre-arrest bail.
6.
I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel at considerable length and have gone through the record carefully.
7 # )8 ) > #) * ) !
!- -
-
* - *
!* !) ! !!
!*
08)' 7$8+ -9 9::;- 2 *)9 </
0056 < 7
2
89;- 2 * )9 </5 6 5 =
6/ , ) ** !! ! & ,- !-
)
- 6&61131% ) ) ! !
! - $%& ' ' >% 2%&% %?
$") %. /0
( 6; ()? @ ?/ 1; ! @ ?/