Tinku @ Faggu v. State Of Haryana

- 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Decided on : 24.03.2026 Tinku @ Faggu . . . Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana . . . Respondent(s)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH PRESENT: Mr. Divij Munjal, Advocate for Mr. Ankur Mehta, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Parveen Kumar Aggarwal, Addl. AG, Haryana assisted by SI Suresh Pal **** SANJAY VASHISTH , J. (Oral) 1.

Prayer in this petition, filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 438 Cr.P.C.), is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, who has been booked in a criminal case arising out of First Information Report, as detailed here-under:- Name & age of Petitioner (s) FIR No.

Date Section(s) Police Station District Tinku @ Faggu, aged about 33 years 19.06.2025 190(1), 3(5), 351(3) and 352 of Ambala City Ambala BNS, 2023 2.

In the present case, on 09.10.2025, following order was passed by this Court:- "2.

Admittedly, petitioner Tinku @ Faggu and Bheem were sitting together in a Scorpio Car bearing Registration No.HR-51-BP-4183. As per allegation levelled by complainant, while driving the said car and passing through them, the petitioner and his co-occupant abused and threatened to kill the complainant. Thereafter, they turned their car and tried to run over the complainant party, but was saved because they moved on the other side.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that no injury is even alleged to have been caused by the petitioner or other co-accused Bheem, who has already been granted the concession of regular bail by the Lower Court vide order dated 09.07.2025. The allegations which are oral in nature, are yet to be proved. However, the petitioner is ready to join

- 2 - investigation and to fully cooperate, if protected from arrest. 4.

Notice of motion.

5.

On advance notice, Mr. Kanwar Sanjiv Kumar, AAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent State and seeks some time to file status report in the matter.

6.

List on 12.01.2026.

7.

In the meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join investigation as and when required to do so by the Investigating Agency. In the event of his arrest, the petitioner shall be released on ad-interim bail, subject to his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer. The petitioner shall also abide by all the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.). 8.

Besides, it is directed that petitioner would hand over his passport to the Investigating Agency or to Court concerned, if he possesses. Otherwise, would submit an affidavit, disclosing the fact that he does not possess any passport.

9.

It is also directed that before leaving country any time during trial, petitioner would seek prior permission of the Court." 3.

Continuing his submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that in compliance of the order dated 09.10.2025, passed by this Court, petitioner has joined the investigation, and has fully co-operated. Therefore, he prays for confirmation of the said interim anticipatory bail order.

4.

Learned State counsel on instructions, confirms the said averment made by counsel for the petitioner of joining the investigation by the petitioner, and submits that as of now, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation. 5.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

6.

Since, petitioner has already joined the investigation and custodial interrogation is no more required; ad-interim bail order dated 09.10.2025, passed by this Court is hereby made absolute. However, petitioner shall continue to join the investigation as and when required to do so and abide by all the terms and conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.

7.

Accordingly, petition stands disposed of, accordingly.

- 3 - 8.

However, present order would be subject to the submission of passport of the petitioner to the Investigating Agency or to Court concerned, if he possesses, within a period of one week from today. Otherwise, he would submit an affidavit, disclosing the fact that he does not possess any passport.

It is clarified that in case, aforesaid condition is not complied with, this order would be considered as non est automatically. Pending misc. application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE March 24, 2026 J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No