← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/57024/2025allowed

Tajinder Singh Alias Nihangi And Another v. State Of Punjab And Another

2026-01-19Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra2 pages

CRM-M-57024-2025 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-57024-2025 (O&M) Date of decision:19.01.2026 Tajinder Singh @ Nihangi Singh & another ... Petitioners Vs.

State of Punjab & another ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA.

Present:

Mr. Anirudh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Durgesh Garg, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. Yuvraj Dhananjay, Advocate for respondent No.2. ...

MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL).

1.

The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short-'BNSS') for quashing of FIR No.320 dated 17.11.2022, registered under Sections 452, 427, 506, 34 IPC, at Police Station Sadar, District Police Commissionerate, Amritsar and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise deed(s) dated 22.09.2025 (Annexures P-2 and P-3 respectively). 2 .

This Court vide order dated 14.10.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise.

3.

Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the HARJEET KAUR 2026.01.20 14:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-57024-2025 (O&M) -2learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Amritsar and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Judge has submitted report dated 29.11.2025 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence.

4.

Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5.

In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6.

Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No.320 dated 17.11.2022, registered under Sections 452, 427, 506, 34 IPC, at Police Station Sadar, District Police Commissionerate, Amritsar and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise deed(s) dated 22.09.2025 (Annexures P-2 and P-3 respectively) are quashed qua the petitioners. (MANISHA BATRA) 19.01.2026 JUDGE harjeet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No HARJEET KAUR 2026.01.20 14:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document