← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/57407/2025allowed

Vikram Singh Alias Vicky Alias Kabbadi v. State Of Punjab

2026-01-21Ms. Justice Aaradhna Sawhney5 pages

 



   

 



!

"#"

  !$ #%

"&!  

 !"#!$%  !& '

()   '#  !() *! ( $! &

!  +# ,&( -)+( #% ...

 !& '*"+, /*  #!$ &"    &

!#  !0 /1(

!(#"

" 231!

4     " 

 "  ($!! !!$!$$"&# "5#6" !$1!

-#"

 "! !& #" ")   !5   !'! +  5(- " 

5("& $! !$

5* $ " $! !# "!! !

 5!78 

        

    



    

      !    "       #$ %! 

&

 !



     ! 

 $  !

 

'

 &

'()'



 '

 



     9#5  !!$ *"

 !(557"&& $ !#

!#"

(7!7""

!     !* &&5  !$! !$ 5$! 5 :# (& 5!# ( 5

,"7"

" *

!      ) * !$7 (

!

 0   7"$  ,"7"

"

"7 7!     )"&!

5 (  " " "! &

!$!  !$ ' !#"5$! &

!!  "  &

!"

$5"5 &5   &" "!5! "

"!$"#"& ! 1!

!*7"$$ $! 3$ (7"&  #&$! "!#" &!5 !$$ 5"(7!$! 5 !! 5!7  ! & ;   "&" "

! !7  *"

 !!$"!! "

<!7*(! $!55!7  ($5"!*!$ "  !;

 &!7 7"&5 #&! 3  "$#  "# !!$5 !#"5  $5"

!$ "" #&&!"# ! "&& $! $   * !#  &! !$ 2'(&!

"7

! !#  

!7"#  

&   " 555&!""""

! "!$ !

   # !  =#  "  7  5"!  !  !&5

 7      Investigating Officer, who also did not apprise petitioner of his legal right u/s 50 of the NDPS Act. Further, despite the fact that petitioner was allegedly caught from public place, no efforts were made to join any independent person as a 'witness' to the case proceedings raising a serious doubt on the genuineness of the story put-forth by prosecution. Learned counsel next contends that investigation in the present case is complete, for challan has already been filed. T#"(5 5 !!

 !$ !&5 !!$  5  $# # "=# !

>*  5  !$"# !" *  !*(5 !#"5!  "  $# 

 !!$&

! #" !

(7!#5 ! "*#"$#5&#&!"

7!#5 5"!* !5 *!$ "2#  5  "# # ) 5

!$ !"

# !!$3

' !#"5$ 5! "  &

!"

!* !!  5"231!

   0  0#6"

the NDPS Act, PS Lehra, Distt. Sangrur ,!#&&5 "&

$! "!# /"

! $!"

"# !"( "&  !  5  * 7 $*!#!$&

!(7!" #" !

"

   ( ; 

  !""

$!55!7  &

!"





  (5   !#"5 "!&&!"

 =#" $!  !$ 5&!

     * 7!$=#"

!5&"    "!$

!(7!"!* !"!$5  #(!"$!   5  * 7  "$*!# " !# ($! $; 

 !""

5( 5 5 !!

!$ !

 "!$$  ! #5

!# , &  &!""

!$ $5 $! &!""!$%#"

 "=#

 - " ""5!$ &

!"& $!

3*  5 !#"5$! & " *! !#  !# "!!



3* 7!$ "# !" * 5 !#"5$! 

!# 7 !#  *  !  "!$ "( !#  "!$  !& !  $#   !!$&

!7!#5 ! "*#"$#5 &#&!"(" "(7 !#  &!"& !$  5 !5#

  $# #(7!#5 * !5 *!$ "  "# ) 5 !$ !"

# !!$ 3

( 5#

   !"&   5 7!#5 ( #"(5"! "   &  &5!$*+   

 $        , & -"5

 <!?5 #&  !#              !"# $%$% &"'" As regards the submission of learned State counsel with respect to

the questionable past antecedents of the petitioner is concerned, suffice it would be point out that as per settled law, bail application of the petitioner can solely not be rejected on the ground that he is involved in another case. "#5  5(&

! "  !""

5"#%  !

"$# "  56"# ! " ! " "$ !!$5   5!# 6-#   "  !

,&

!"55

 $!55!7 !

!"8 "%   &               $  ' $  & 

 !  .

$    

 &



 .

$ "% &  '  & '  

  $    "% &  ' &

$ /   &

$ '

 "% &  ' &&  !

  .

$   

  !,

$

  , &

  !

 !.

$ "% &        !!

      !!



!'    $

 !

 

 !' 

$ 

 ! "% &          

  $     & 

  &

 #$ 

' !   !





  

$

/ !     $!   

.

$   &   !!   & '  

      "% &         $

   "% &    !$  

  $     .

$!

'      

  

 $  !    

!

 

 & 

  

  !  !

     

  '&      

  .

$    

!

    ",%      .

$/1$  2       &

       

 && &  '  

  &  

 )!

5( &" &

! "55!7 " 5   "  "!$ $!"

!

!"(   "55   !"55 5"  ! &

!  "!

3* 7!$ !*( "5 $

   !"* !"

 5

$! &#&!"!$&" &!

" 7!#5 !  !" # "!& !!  "!$ "    57!#5 &!

&  5!$ $!"

!"* !"

 + !& ',

 

  "# -  

0$  > "& 6"! 8@"61!

> &! 5 8@"61!