← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/60173/2024dismissed

Pritpal Singh And Another v. State Of Punjab

2026-03-10Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara,Mrs. Justice Sukhvinder Kaur2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-60173-2024 DECIDED ON: 10.03.2026 PRITPAL SINGH AND ANOTHER .....PETITIONERS

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB .....RESPONDENT

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR

Present:

None for the petitioners.

Ms. Pooja Nayar Sharma, DAG, Punjab.

ANOOP CHITKARA J (ORAL) 1.

Petitioners have come before this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.91 dated 02.10.2022 under Sections 153(B), 20(B) IPC, Section 3 of Damage to Public and Private Property Act, 2014, Sections 66(F), 67 of Information and Technology Act, 2000 and Sections 10 and 13 of the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, 1967 registered at Police Station Thermal Bathinda, District Bathinda (Annexure P-1) and Challan under Section 173 Cr.P.Cdated 27.12.2023 (Annexure P-6).

2.

Case called twice, but none has put in appearance on behalf of petitioner. As such, petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. 3.

It is clarified that Registry shall not entertain any application for restoration of the present petition. However liberty is reserved to petitioner to file fresh. The time for which the present petition was pending before this Court shall not be counted for the purpose of limitation. Filing and disposal of the present petition shall not come in the way of the petitioner. POONAM 2026.03.13 18:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

4.

Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand disposed of accordingly as well.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE (SUKHVINDER KAUR) March 10, 2026 JUDGE poonam Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No POONAM 2026.03.13 18:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document