Sukhpal Kumar Alias Sukhpal Sharma v. State Of Punjab And Another

   

      


 

  !"#$%"&'('#)*+ +
   







 




* ,- + . . .  

     ! 

"


# $ 

%&
'  !  ( . . /+            
!  )(*     + & ' 
 
 (,(-.  /+

01  &'

2'34 56,) ,- (,76.871  
!(96 --9

5(9),:4; 7*:,.  /4;01 '  !

 %  % !
'

'<!2  !' '  !  -, 7, (,(5 .8(1  <    < 

( ( '  <  '4 ;

 ' '  +7,8;89,,:  ''  ! <!&!
! =+  
'  > !   '!&! -
  &<& () ,7 (,() 
' 

 ! 
%  %  % !
'

-1-

   !  ;&   ' & 5 Contends that matter has been amicably settled between the parties, i.e. petitioner as well as respondent No.2; hence FIR in question as well as consequential proceedings deserve to be quashed. ) ? !  (!<' ! 

:

Still further, learned State Counsel, on instructions from the police officer present, is not averse in case the above FIR along with consequential proceedings are quashed and set aside on the basis of the compromise entered into between the parties i.e. petitioner well as respondent No.2.

7.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the paperbook. * " ;8  +!  <  '!    (6 (,(5 <'  8

           
 
           !"  #$

 

$ %&' () *  

+$

+#+ , !(-(  
 .

  .    /  0  //      
 1 2 -11 .




#%&'()*

1

3      - 4  (
 55 .

&  (522 / 


)

# 4  . 7     &
8  0   
   2 / 
 
8/
/7 '
 9 /1  
 2     -  
7 -2-

     2 /       
  
 

1 11120 

 ! / 
12 / /
/  
  

0  1 1
72 /
/-:!// 4  
        8  1 

 
  11  
   
    1     /
 /  -:!//  4 concerned is directed to send the same along with its report regarding the 112
'
 //70 
 //0;)

127

  !"

<  7
/1



 /:


#  <      11      8/7  
0 7
/

 /1281
 1

, !    1
  /     1/:8  
  /
 /        2     /
 / -:!//  4  
        1 


11

+

1+

0 



/
//

87 11127 
'

$ &7 
2 /
/-:!// 4
1/ In terms of aforesaid order, statements of both the parties were recorded and a report dated 09.01.2025 has been received from   @! ' 3 ; % . For reference, the operative part of report reads as under:- -3-

% *! 12/721
  /7


1/7

/>1?

/ 18/8
 281


%* & 1 !83 /1
 82
  
8/8
 281
 !" 

 2
/
/1

:/1
 7 

% * & 1 !83 - // 
 /
72
 -
 '
 8
 

%#* 1 1 1//8 



/>1?

/ 1

2  -  1120 1 @8/7 1 /7

1)
 28
20  0 7
/

%* & 1 !83

 - 1/:5
:8
   
1/7/8

7, A0
  ;  ' ).')012+.! !"#$3)4 5/



.

/ 8 ,

 11 28
 211
 ; 0 - 1/
 !"1/'  5



1 0 81/1
 
   -
 ! 00
/
 0 7/12 2'

0 
/
 08B ;%*  
5%*82 7  !0 0 1/
 1/ !"172'
0  

 -4-

81 8/
 
0/


 
1 
722

A082' 0 -1

8

 
87 1 A 
       1/ 
87      / 1

7 2/7 
8   8181C1/7
  
 8 /
 
  8

817 1//7711 20 81
 
/  
//  (8-&  11
272/80 /0   7   D    8
    7  2     1/
8/8   1/  880 /1/7

1/78//8 
   
               //7 111// 1/8/  /  117/
07  1/7 
  0      0    2//7  8   /
  8/8
 
 !

 7 -17 1/
802 11 20     
  
    81     2/7   81
2/ 
 1/ 0/
 

5
 
'150/
2
 127    1/   
  //  
 1/  /1 
110 81 !



 0 28%* 18 - //20//0 5
  1/
 In view of above discussion, this Court is fully convinced that the offence is entirely personal in nature and does not involve public peace or tranquility. Thus, quashing of the FIR in question along with consequential proceedings, on the basis of compromise would bring peace and harmony to secure the ends of justice.

7( ;2&  <> 34'

<!2 !' '   2 

'!.1 &  + +

. .

/  



      
      -6-