Shree Baba Burarik Mandir Samiti v. State Of Haryana And Others

2024:PHHC:040490-DB

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.28859-2023(O&M) Reserved On: 05.03.2024 Date of Decision: 19.03.2024 Shree Baba Burarik Mandir Samiti

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE LALIT BATRA Argued by: Ms. Sumitra, Advocate for Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s) Mr. Anupam Gupta, Senior Advocate (Amicus Curiae) with Mr. Sukhpal Singh, Advocate.

Mr. Ankur Mittal, Addl. A.G., Haryana with Mr. Pardeep Prakash Chahar, Sr. DAG, Haryana, Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana, Ms. Kushaldeep Kaur, Advocate and Mr. Shivam Garg, Advocate.

Mr. B.S.Bairagi, Advocate for respondents No.5 to 12.

***** SURESHWAR THAKUR, J.

CM NO.3201-2024 Since the applicants are just and necessary parties for making an adjudication upon the instant writ petition. Therefore, the applicants are arrayed as respondents No.5 to 12 in the array of co-respondents in the memo of parties.

Accordingly, the application stands allowed. Amended memo of parties is taken on record. Registry is directed to tag the same at the appropriate place.

Raman Kumar 2024.03.21 11:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

2024:PHHC:040490-DB MAIN CASE For orders, see detailed judgement of even date, passed in CWP No.13864-2012, titled Sushil Kumar and others Vs. State of Haryana and others.

(SURESHWAR THAKUR) JUDGE (LALIT BATRA) JUDGE March 19, 2024 raman Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Raman Kumar 2024.03.21 11:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document