Gurneet Singh And ANR v. Gautam Jain

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH COCP-4785-2024 Date of Decision: 20.12.2024 GURNEET SINGH AND ANR ....Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

GAUTAM JAIN ....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA

Present:

Mr. Rahul Sharma-I, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. A.D.S. Sukhija, Advocate for the respondent. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) Short reply by way of affidavit of Gautam Jain IAS, Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Jalandhar along with speaking order, has been filed by learned counsel for the respondent, in terms of decision passed by the Writ Court.

In view thereof, no further orders are required to be passed. The petition stands disposed of.

Rule stands discharged.

However, in case the needful is not done within the aforestated period, as per undertaking, the petitioners would be at liberty to seek revival of the present contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring /concerned officer(s) would be liable to pay additional sum of Rs.50,000/- as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioners towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application.

(HARKESH MANUJA) December 20, 2024 JUDGE Sangeeta Whether reasoned/speaking:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No SANGEETA 2024.12.21 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document