Jatinder Singh Alias Shera v. State Of Punjab

On 17.11.2025, this Court had passed the following order:- "Learned counsel been falsely implicated as he could not be na information received wi the police party having r Inspector. A fact of the merely parked at the par to be at the alleged spo been done merely as he in the election of Sarpa co-accused Jasbir Sing been granted interim an vide order dated 01.10.2 join the investigation a investigating agency and submits that the petitioner has in the case which is apparent abbed despite there being an th regard to illegal mining and reached the spot headed by Sub e matter is that the truck was rking space but later on shown ot along with sand, which has had supported the ruling party anch. Similarly circumstanced h and Palwinder Singh have nticipatory bail by this Court 2025. He is ready and willing to as and when required by the d will cooperate PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.01.20 19:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

3.

Learned counsel submits that in pursuance of the aforementioned order, the petitioner has not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the investigating agency requires the petitioner to appear, he shall make himself available without demur.

4.

Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Karnail Singh affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioner and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioner is not required for further custodial interrogation. 5.

In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner is allowed and the order dated 17.11.2025 granting interim bail to him, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.

6.

However, it is made clear that if the petitioner fails to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to him.

PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.01.20 19:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.