Ram Mehar v. State Of Haryana Through Its Additional Chief Secretary,

CWP No.31967 of 2024 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No.31967 of 2024 (O&M) Date of decision: 27.11.2024 Ram Mehar ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR

Present:

Mr. Kamal Kumar Mor, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, DAG, Haryana.

NAMIT KUMAR J. (Oral) Prayer in this writ petition filed by the petitioner under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari, for quashing the action of the respondent for not entertaining various representations dated 30.01.2023 and 21.08.2023 (Annexures P-3 and P-4) and legal notice sent through e-mail dated 07.08.2024 (Annexure P-13), vide which the petitioner requested for granting him financial benefits and retiral benefits as per Ex-gratia Policy, 1995. Further a writ of mandamus has been sought for directing the respondents to entertain and decide the representations dated 30.01.2023 and 21.08.2023 (Annexures P-3 and P-4) and legal notice sent through e-mail dated 07.08.2024 (Annexure P-13) and to grant interest on due amount of financial benefits @ 12% per annum for the delayed period.

MOHD YAKUB 2024.11.27 17:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh

CWP No.31967 of 2024 (O&M) At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh, on the same cause of action, with better particulars particularly by attaching complete copy of judgment dated 26.04.2011 passed in RSA No.3762 of 2010, titled as "State of Haryana vs Ram Mehar". Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE 27.11.2024 yakub Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No MOHD YAKUB 2024.11.27 17:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh