Karnail Singh v. State Of Punjab
!" #$%$ &'
( # )* +,
' -./0/ /
!
"
### /,1.2' 3
$
%
&& &'
'(') * +)
,
!
!
- * * +)
$&# % $
).'
/ % 0 '('1 2 3/045
%
,6!
-+ ,60
18.08.2024 Sadar, Mansa, District Mansa 103, 3(5), 49 and 238 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNS') and Section 27 of Arms Act, 1959 (offence under Sections 190, 191(3) of
BNS deleted later on) '
/
!
,6-
!
% ! ! &.
(.
'(')
!
% .((
- -
" -
0 "
! %
"
-
%
! %
! 0
--
! %
!
- -
-% -
!
-
7
! !
-
!
! !
!
% '('(
-
8
8 -
0
-
% %-
,6
- -%
! +
9
- -!
4 '& && '(')
$
%
%!
8 -
0
8
!
0 !
6 ,6 0 :& ('
(:
'(''
% !
!
!% ('
(:
'('' / 0 %
! 8 ; 8 %
8 %
-
('
(:
'('';- ,60 :&-
* +
4.
Status report has been filed by respondent-State. It is argued by learned State counsel that there are serious allegations against the petitioner, as he was kingpin of the crime of murder of the victim-Sukhwinder Singh. During the course of investigation, it has been revealed that immediately after committing murder of the victim-Sukhwinder Singh, the co-accused Narain Singh had made a call to the petitioner on his phone thereby showing the complicity of the petitioner in the crime. His custodial interrogation is required for conducting thorough investigation. $
-
5.
I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned
State counsel at considerable length and have gone through the record carefully.
6.
-
,6
<
!
!
6- - - %
%
%
%
!
!
-
! -
*
! ! 6- ; % !
; - - - % % ! ,
*
!
! -
% -
+ !!
!
!
* %% % ;
0 * % !
-
!
*
As per the discussion so made, no ground
! -
%
!
!
=
6 -
!
*
8.
!
! %
5 /6
( # )* +,