← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/59597/2024disposed of

Rajiv Kumar v. State Of Haryana And Others

2024-11-28Mrs. Justice Manjari Nehru Kaul2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-59597-2024 (O&M) Date of decision: November 28th, 2024 Rajiv Kumar .....Petitioner

Versus

State Of Haryana and others .....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL

Present:

Dr. Kirandeep Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner.

MANJARI NEHRU KAUL , J. (ORAL) Petitioner is seeking issuance of directions to respondent No.2 to decide the representation dated 01.10.2024 (Annexure P-4) on the basis of complaint dated 24.06.2024 (Annexure P-2) filed by him.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a representation was given on 01.10.2024 (Annexure P-4) to the police authorities, however, it had failed to yield any response. It has been submitted that the official respondents were under a legal obligation to pass an appropriate order on his complaint. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Ambala, to look into the representation dated 01.10.2024 (Annexure P-4) of the petitioner and take appropriate steps in accordance with law. 3.

Notice of motion to official respondents only. PUNEET SACHDEVA 2024.11.28 14:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M-59597-2024 (O&M) -24.

On asking of the Court, Ms. Trishanjali Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents.

5.

In the wake of the limited prayer of the petitioner, the instant petition is disposed of and respondent No.2Superintendent of Police, Ambala, is directed to look into the grievance of the petitioner and take appropriate steps, if any required, under the provisions of law. However, if respondent No.2 does not find any substance in the allegations levelled in the representation dated 01.10.2024 (Annexure P-4), then the petitioner shall be duly informed as per the parameters laid down by the Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari Versus Government of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. 2013 (4) RCR (Criminal) 979.

November 28th, 2024 (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2024.11.28 14:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh