Rajpal v. State Of Haryana And Others

APURVA 2024.12.03 11:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh

the petitioner would be satisfied at this stage, in case a time bound direction is issued to respondent No.5 (Deputy Commissioner, Mahendergarh, District Mahendergarh) to consider and decide the aforesaid legal notice dated 28.10.2024 (Annexure P-10).

3.

On advance service of copy of petition, Ms. Upasana Dhawan, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, appears on behalf of the respondents-State and opposes issuance of notice of motion. She further submits that respondent No.5 (Deputy Commissioner, Mahendergarh, District Mahendergarh)/competent authority shall take decision either way, on the pending legal notice dated 28.10.2024 (Annexure P-10) within a period of three months from today.

4.

Keeping in view the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and without commenting on the merits of the case, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.5 (Deputy Commissioner, Mahendergarh, District Mahendergarh)/competent authority to consider and decide legal notice dated 28.10.2024 (Annexure P-10) by way of passing a speaking order, after affording due opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties, within a period of three months from today. 5.

All the pending application(s), if any, shall also stand closed. APURVA 2024.12.03 11:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh