Manjit Singh Rissam v. Union Of India And ORS

CWP-29095-2023 -12023:PHHC:165214

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-29095-2023 Date of Decision : 22.12.2023 MANJIT SINGH RISSAM ......... PETITIONER V/S UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ......... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present :

Mr.Sameer Sachdeva, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Ruchi Sekhri, Sr.Panel Counsel for respondent No.1-UOI.

Mr. Ashwani Talwar, Advocate and Mr. Sahej Mahajan, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3.

**** JAGMOHAN BANSAL , J. (Oral) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of Constitution of India is seeking directions to the respondents to re-fix his pension.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that respondents may be directed to decide his representation in the light of judgment of Madras High Court in W.P.No.28282 of 2015, decided on 20.04.2023, titled as "M.Thiagarajan vs. United India Insurance Company Limited and others.

3.

Learned counsel for respondents No.2 and 3, who on advance notice is present in Court, asserts that the competent authority would look Anju Goel 2023.12.22 14:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CWP-29095-2023 -22023:PHHC:165214 into representation dated 07.09.2023 (Anenxure P-3) of the petitioner and pass an appropriate order within two months from today. 4.

In the wake of statement of learned counsel for the parties, the present petition stands disposed of.

( JAGMOHAN BANSAL ) 22.12.2023 JUDGE anju Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Anju Goel 2023.12.22 14:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh