Charanjit Kaur And Another v. State Of Punjab And Others
! " # $ %%%%
!
&
( ) ( ( *+,
-
)
' #
.
/ 0 1 ( # (
2
2 '
/ 3# ) 2
.
)
. ' 22 . / 4
( ' . /# )
( /# )
('
)
/ 556 ) )( !
.
.#
/ 7( ' (8#
/3
.
/ .((2
' '
( ( /
/
/3!
.$ . /
) )#
(
'
9 / ' $
#2 ' ((2
. (
/ $
.
(
( $
. (
!
) $ . .
.
7 (2#
/. ( (2 (
''
. ' 8- #
. /1 6*
*# 65: - 1 4
($ /.2 .
..
)
. '
! ( ' 1 /$'
#3 '
#;
(
.
# $
$ $(2 2
. ! ..' - # 2) < $
. ( (
.
$
(()
.) 2 .
/ $# / )
36 ,=
<:1 :>
/ 1#)$# ((# ! ? #
() ?$
. (
(
. )
(
#
.' $ ( 3 )@." ? ( '
( .
)) ((
2 )
$ . 3*=1>
.
.
. ?
.
( . $ ( ! :.
8-
$ . # @ ! 2 ' (()
.
$
"27. As we have already observed above, the Magistrate has very wide powers to direct registration of an FIR and to ensure a proper investigation, and for this purpose he can monitor the investigation to ensure that the investigation is done properly (though he cannot investigate himself). The High Court should discourage the practice of filing a writ petition or petition under Section 482 Criminal Procedure Code simply because a person has a grievance that his FIR has not been registered by the police, or after being registered, proper investigation has not been done by the police. For this grievance, the remedy lies under Sections 36 and 154(3) before the concerned police officers, and if that is of no avail, under Section 156(3) Criminal Procedure Code before the Magistrate or by filing a criminal complaint under Section 200 Criminal Procedure Code and not by filing a writ petition or a petition under Section 482 Criminal Procedure Code.
28. It is true that alternative remedy is not an absolute bar to a writ petition, but it is equally well settled that if there is an alternative remedy the High Court should not ordinarily interfere."
* &
)
.' 2 ? ( '
!
"# $%
&''(( )
*
&'( ,
& ?
. # ) ( <
.
) 5 = ) 35 "/>#
'
$ . # )$# )(
$ . '
(
''#
( .
' )
<
2 & '
( <
'
) '2 (
$ .
.. 2# 2
.)2' $
.
$
..( 5 8# $ .
( .
)(( 7
() 2 ' #(
( ( $
2
.
.
.
(2
( 2 (
.
( 3*=1>= ) ,3=1> "/> 6 - $ ) '
#
(
2
.(2#
( )
. 2'
"
#