Bharat Sharma v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH

Sr. No.: 119 Civil Writ Petition No.32035 of 2024 Date of Decision: November 28, 2024 Bharat Sharma ..... PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

State of Haryana & others ..... RESPONDENT(S)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA PRESENT: - Mr. Shubham Saroha, Advocate, with Mr. Dharmender, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. K.K. Chahal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Tribhuvan Dahiya, J (Oral) The petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to grant the benefit of additional ten per cent of the Basic Pay plus Dearness Allowance to the petitioner in compliance of the amendment dated 13.04.2022, in the Teachers Transfer Policy 2016. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the third respondent. At this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case the third respondent is directed to decide his pending legal notice dated 16.09.2024, Annexure P-6, in a specified period.

3.

Learned State counsel, appearing on advance notice, submits that the pending legal notice dated 16.09.2024, will be decided by the third respondent-Director, Secondary Education, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law, within three months.

4.

In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. AVIN KUMAR 2024.11.28 18:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order.

CWP No.32035 of 2024 [2] 5.

Ordered accordingly.

6.

In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of ` 50,000 to the petitioner. (Tribhuvan Dahiya) Judge November 28, 2024 avin Whether Speaking/ Reasoned:

Yes/ No Whether Reportable:

Yes/ No AVIN KUMAR 2024.11.28 18:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order.