← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaRA-CW/437/2023disposed of

Parikshit Bansal v. Union Of India And ORS.

2024-02-02Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal2 pages

115+229 CM-1789-CWP-2024 IN/AND RA-CW-437-2023 IN CWP-20217-2022 PARIKSHIT BANSAL VS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Present:

Mr. Kapil Kakkar, Advocate for the applicant-petitioner.

Mr. Sandeep S. Majithia, Advocate for respondent No.2.

Mr. Arun Gosain, Senior Panel Counsel for Union of India-respondents.

**** CM-1789-CWP-2024 Application for placing on record reply to the above noted review application, is allowed, in view of the averments made in the application. Said document is taken on record. Office to append the same at appropriate place.

CM stands disposed of.

RA-CW-437-2023 The applicant-respondent is seeking review/recalling of order dated 21.11.2023 on the ground that petition has been disposed of in the light of judgment of Supreme Court in 'State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Sheela Devi' 2023 Livelaw (SC) 662 whereas said judgment is not applicable to the present case.

Mr. Sandeep S. Majithia, Advocate and Mr. Arun Gosain, Senior Panel Counsel submit that at the time of disposal of main petition they could not apprise the Court in true prospective which resulted into disposal of main petition in the light of judgment of Supreme Court in Sheela Devi (supra).

Per contra, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Asgar Ali 2025.07.17 18:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CM-1789-CWP-2024 IN RA-CW-437-2023 IN CWP-20217-2022 -2petition was disposed of in the light of statement of Mr. Arun Gosain, Senior Panel Counsel, for respondent No.1-UOI whereas instant application has been filed by Mr. Sandeep S. Majithia, Advocate for respondent No.2 Mr. Sandeep S. Majithia, Advocate and Mr. Arun Gosain, Senior Panel Counsel are representing the respondents. It is relevant to notice that respondents herein are Union of India and NIPER. As Mr. Arun Gosain, Senior Panel Counsel is present alongwith Mr. Sandeep S. Majithia, Advocate the objection of learned counsel for the petitioner is not sustainable and this Court finds that matter needs to be examined. Accordingly, application is allowed and petition is restored to its original number.

The Registry is directed to list the petition on 22.02.2024. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 02.02.2024 Ali Asgar Ali 2025.07.17 18:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document