Dalwinder Singh v. State Of Punjab
1 IN TH HE HIGH COURT FOR THE E STATES OF PUNJAB AND HANDIGARH HARYANA AT CH **+,- -. 2
*$1*$* **+
$$$ /00 0 $$$03 0
(
!"#$%&'(# (
!
' Mr. )*&!+
"
,( + *!$& ! - -,.
/$
!
' )%$
0"$ $%"!
% * !* ! 2
13
" $%5 + *
14
! 2 22
!
!!* - 5 &$%"$ $ " #
0 " " $ $% " $ $% " $ $ %#"
" % &#$& & " #" & " " &$ #" '&( & # $ $ " #
* & & "" " " $ !
' #" $$ ) ! & ( " "&( *&$" % %( "" $ 0 %$ " # ' "$$ #
( "( #"
8 ( $ $% " ("" $% # " !
" #" # #
# " #"
2## $$& & " # 0 / # ' # % "$ $ !
! #" #"9 0 #($ ## # 5 ' 3661) +37 7$ %
!" # "
"$$%
& '(# !) *+,
-.)/ 01"% 22 2 ' $ ) *+13$%4
' . 3636,3/ , ,)
/ "" %
-
4 '# #
-,#8./36 7,1/ ) ,9
/ $$% 45 ' .
. 36 " ,!/ ,)
/ 776% #:
: 52 ;'< 0 0") *+ "$1% 71)
*+ $7%&
- '(# % !
!) *+ 01" #
; 7 77) *+" 1 ,# " & ":
:#"$% (
## " & ( $ * ( #1
,$" & $ "$ " # # "" " $ & # & " (% $ ; " $ & & ("( ! < = $" " 5 5' 3661 ) +37$ > &*" 1
" # & ($ $ *% '&( &/13
2 # ( " , " # ( " 13
2 & &; 21
" "" $ 1
& # & %"21% % "" $ ' #& ("(
+ !
< =
"& " # 21 % $( #"$ & #% $ " " 22 ' $ ) *+ 13$ 4
'. 3 3636,3/ ,)
/"" 9.
Further, a perusal of order dat ted 17.10.2012 reveals that it wa as in the due kn nowledge of the learned trial Court that the petitioner had b been residing ab broad. However, & (&#$% " % &" $ # +% ?; , ( 9& 9" # " & ( $ $ &$% , $%$"# " ( " # 0 # # ! #"& &%"( ! & #"%& "(
, $%& " # " ! $ $ $ % & ; $ " "
5 ' #
- 36 " )) =
,#8 8./1$$"
, % (& #$( (& && $( " " &#" 13
"$% % 5 5 + *
14
5 ! 2 2 2
! ! * - 5 &$% " $ " # & " #
'&( " $ & " & * $/ " %$ %"" $! 6 !!
$ % "%$ " $ $ $ # / % $/ % $$"$% &&
$( %"" $ $ $ $$ "#;" % $ ;" % "
" # $ " #
0 "" " $ #%
# """$ &"& *#% " $ # $# *$1*$**+ + , (
!
' .
%&6#
Whet ther speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whet ther reportable Yes/No