Shakina Khatun And Another v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRWP-11051-2025 Date of Decision: 20.04.2026 SHAKINA KHATUN AND ANOTHER ... PETITIONERS

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present:- None for the petitioners.

Mr. Vijay Kumar, AAG, Haryana.

H.S. Grewal, J.(Oral) 1.

There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. 2.

Learned State counsel has filed a reply by way of an affidavit of Ram Kumar, HPS, DSP, Shahabad, District Kurukshetra, in the Court today, and the same is taken on record. He submits that the statements of the private respondents have been recorded, wherein they have stated that they have no objection to the marriage of the petitioners. It is further stated in the reply that the petitioners have also stated that they do not require any police protection. 3.

In view of the above, no order is required to be passed in this case. 4.

Accordingly, present petition stands disposed of. 20.04.2026 (H.S.GREWAL) renu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No RENU RAWAT 2026.04.21 15.55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh