← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/58253/2025allowed

Manjit Alias Manjeet Kumar And Another v. State Of Haryana

2025-12-04Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal3 pages



IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-58253-2025 Decided on : 04.12.2025 Manjit @ Manjeet Kumar and another ...... Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana ...... Respondent CORAM : 

   *** Present :

Mr. Munish Behl, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana for the respondent-State.

Mr. Rajesh Kumar Kashyap, Advocate for the complainant.

***    , J (ORAL)   

 

 

            

   



 

   

 !"#$ %&

& 

 

&'

( '( $'

( )'(  %'(



' $'

( 

  (    *

  +, 

  



   

!"#-     ,

      .

  

 -    

  



/ -

0   , ,

# )

10,

,2 



!"#  3 











/    ,  



  

 /   -

   2





/

    /   2

 

/    ,       

  ,

   

     - -   

- 

  ,   -

-

  

   -

-  

  ,    2  

   ,

,

, -

-

, 

  4      ,



!"#3 





  

    

 

  &

&    

  /  



  3 



 /



  ,  



   /  ,     -

   5,  

    -  /   



 

  6  



 /  -  3  

  

   -    

  

0 -    2 / ,

  

  



 ,,

 



  2  ,



  



  -

0  /    

,

2

  ,

     



       , However, he has not controverted the fact that the petitioners are the first time offenders and are not involved in any other case. 5.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant has also opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners on the ground that the petitioners were actively involved in the crime and, thus, do not deserve the

concession of bail.

6.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties at length and after perusing the record of the case, it is evident that the petitioners are in custody for the last more than 06 months 14 days; challan stands presented, charges are yet to be framed and the fact that the trial is proceeding at snail's pace, no useful purpose would be served by detaining them in further custody. Their further detention without the prospect of the trial being concluded in the near future would be violative of their rights under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. %

7  



  



 

+57 



            ,  



 



 

/  

 ,

  ,



 

     

  +  7

 "

   

  8   9 8.  5 9  "

 / -  

   /

 

 

 -  

                 

   

         

 

   

        7 1*  :

 17;:  "

  



 

  

 5

 

,



        ,,    

  <

 

1  = > 1 <

   = > 1