Ashwani v. State Of Haryana

In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh CRM-M-61286-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision:-11.12.2024 Ashwani ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL Present:- Mr. Ritesh Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Neeraj Sheoran, DAG, Haryana.

***** FIR No.

Dated Police Station Section/s 2.3.2024 Farukhnagar, District Gurugram 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 204 of Indian Penal Code and Section 66-D of IT Act GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J. (Oral) 1.

The instant petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking grant of regular bail in respect of the aforementioned FIR. 2.

The FIR in question was lodged by complainant - Ravinder, wherein it is alleged that the accused had cheated the complainant of an amount of Rs.15 lakhs.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR came to be lodged under some misunderstanding, which has now been resolved and the matter has been amicably compromised and infact a petition for quashing of FIR on the basis of compromise is yet to be filed.

Pankaj Kakkar 2024.12.12 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M-61286-2024 (O&M) ( 2 ) 4.

At this stage, Mr. Pankaj Bains, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the complainant and has filed memorandum of appearance, which is taken on record. Learned counsel representing the complainant has endorsed the factum of compromise and has stated that the complainant does not have any objection for grant of bail.

5.

Opposing the petition, learned State counsel submitted that since the petitioner is specifically named in the FIR, no case for grant of bail is made out. Learned State counsel has, however, informed that the petitioner as on date has been behind bars since the last about 4 months and 21 days and that the petitioner is not involved in any other cases. 6.

This Court has considered rival submissions addressed before this Court. 7.

Without commenting anything as regards merits of the case, but having regard to the fact that the matter has been amicably resolved amongst the parties and also the long custody of the petitioner i.e. about 4 months and 21 days, the instant petition is accepted and the petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on his furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of learned trial Court/Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate concerned.

11.12.2024 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) pankaj Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No Pankaj Kakkar 2024.12.12 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document