Jai Vir v. State Of Haryana Through Its Additional Chief Secretary To Government Of Haryana,

CWP-32655-2024 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-32655-2024 Date of Decision: 03.12.2024 Jai Vir

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present:- Mr. Lalit Rishi, Advocate, and Mr. Satwant Singh, Advocate for the petitioner TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking a writ of mandamus directing the third respondent to treat the candidature of the petitioner under Category BC-A Non-Creamy Layer as per certificate dated 06.08.2024, Annexure P-2.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case respondent No.3 is directed to decide the pending representation, dated 30.11.2024, Annexure P-9, in a specified period. 3.

Notice of motion.

4.

Mr. Ravinder Singh Budhwar, Addl. AG, Haryana, accepts notice and submits that the pending representation shall be decided by respondent No.3 expeditiously.

PAYAL 2024.12.04 16:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-32655-2024 -25.

In view thereof, without going into merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3/Secretary, Haryana Public Service Commission, to consider and decide the pending representation, dated 30.11.2024, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. 6.

In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioner. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 03.12.2024 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PAYAL 2024.12.04 16:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document