Rakesh Mittal v. Anil Kumar And Others

CR-7492-2025 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.151 CR-7492-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 03.11.2025 RAKESH MITTAL ....Petitioner

Versus

ANIL KUMAR AND OTHERS .....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- Mr. B.S. Jaswal, Mr. G.S. Jaswal and Mr. Buta Singh, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr. Ashish Bansal, Advocate for the caveators/respondents.

***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral) The present revision petition has been filed by the petitioner/tenant, to challenge the affirmatory orders passed by learned Rent Controller and learned Appellate Authority, thereby ordering the eviction of the petitioner from the demised premises.

However, at this stage, counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not press to assail the aforesaid orders, though, he only makes a prayer for gain of time, to hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises to the respondents, who are the co-owners of the demised premises. At this juncture, counsel for the caveators/respondents submits that he has no objection if some reasonable time is given to the petitioner to hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises. Counsel for the respondents agrees to grant the petitioner a period of eight months from today onwards, to hand over the vacant possession of the property. This Sonu 2025.11.04 09:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CR-7492-2025 (O&M) time period is acceptable to the counsel for the petitioner and counsel gives an undertaking on behalf of the petitioner to hand over the vacant possession of the suit property to the respondents, within a period of eight months from today onwards.

In the light of the undertaking so given, the petitioner is directed to pay the rent, agreed between the parties, due during these eight months' period, by 7th of every month, till he hands over the vacant possession of the demised premises.

In view of the aforesaid amicable settlement reached between the parties, at this stage, counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to pursue with the present revision petition, which may be dismissed as withdrawn.

Ordered accordingly.

However, the petitioner shall remain bound by the undertaking given by his counsel today.

In the light of withdrawal of the aforesaid revision petition, even the counsel for the respondents submits that the respondents shall not pursue the execution petition filed by them and the same shall be withdrawn on the next date, with liberty to file afresh, in case of non-compliance of the aforesaid undertaking.

(ARCHANA PURI) 03.11.2025 JUDGE Himanshu Vats Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

Yes/No Sonu 2025.11.04 09:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document