← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/5249/2024disposed of

Satpal Singh v. State Of Punjab And ORS.

2024-03-05Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh,Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger2 pages

2024:PHHC:031081-DB CWP-5249-2024 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** CWP-5249-2024 Date of Decision: 05.03.2024 Satpal Singh ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER Present :

Mr. Satpal Singh-petitioner in person.

Mr. Dhruv Dayal, Addl. A.G., Punjab.

*** SUDHIR SINGH, J. (Oral) 1.

Petitioner has filed the instant Writ Petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ in the nature of Mandamus for directing the respondents to frame the new election criteria and eligibility for the candidates contesting the elections of State Assembly, Municipal Corporation, Municipal Committee and Members of the Village Panchayats in State of Punjab by framing the policy and guidelines with regard to the above said elections. A further prayer has been made by the petitioner for deciding his representation dated 21.10.2023 (Annexure P-1). 2.

Petitioner submits that for redressal of his grievance, he has already made a representation dated 21.10.2023 (Annexure P-1) to the concerned authority, but the same has not been adverted to by the respondents till date. Petitioner submits that he would be satisfied if respondent No.5 is directed to consider and decide his representation dated 21.10.2023 (Annexure P-1).

HIMANI GUPTA 2024.03.30 14:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh

2024:PHHC:031081-DB CWP-5249-2024 -23.

Learned State counsel appearing for the State of Punjab does not raise any objection to the prayer made by petitioner and submits that in case representation dated 21.10.2023 (Annexure P-1) has been served upon respondent No.5, then the same shall be considered and decided by concerned Authority in accordance with law.

4.

In view of the above and without commenting on the merits of the case, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.5 to consider the representation dated 21.10.2023 (Annexure P-1) of the petitioner and pass an appropriate order, in accordance with law, at the earliest.

5.

All pending application/s, if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (HARSH BUNGER) JUDGE 05.03.2024 Himani Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No HIMANI GUPTA 2024.03.30 14:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh