← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRWP/12582/2023dismissed

Deepak Sharma v. State Of Punjab And Others

2024-01-01Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal2 pages

2024:PHHC:

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Criminal Writ Petition No. 12582 of 2023 Date of Decision: 01.01.2024 Deepak Sharma ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

The State of Punjab and Others ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.

Present:

Mr. Gopal Singh Nahel, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. N.S.Kaliraman, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.

Anil Kshetarpal, J.

1.

On 29.12.2023, the following order was passed:- "The petitioner herein prays for protection of life and liberty of his wife, who is allegedly kidnapped by her parents. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner married Smt. Khushi Devi on 20.11.2023. Previously, they have also filed a petition for protection of life and liberty, which was disposed of with the directions. Thereafter, the private respondents promised to marry Smt. Khushi Devi to the petitioner according to their customs but subsequently, backed out. In the meantime, Smt. Khushi Devi has been illegally detained. The petitioner apprehends that some permanent damage may be caused to Smt. Khushi Devi by the private respondents.

DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2024.01.01 13:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document On 28.12.2023, the learned counsel representing the

2024:PHHC:

Criminal Writ Petition No. 12582 of 2023 State of Punjab was requested to take instructions, however, he submits that the police has received representation, which is being looked into.

Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, Senior Superintendent of Police, Sangrur, Punjab, is directed to appear in person on 01.01.2024."

2.

In deference to the aforesaid order, Mr. S.S.Chahal, Senior Superintendent of Police, Sangrur, is present in the Court. He submits that the girl, namely Khushi Devi has been recovered and an official, who was negligent in performing his duty, has been issued a show cause notice. 3.

The learned counsel representing the petitioner also admits that the writ petition is rendered infructuous.

4.

Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (Anil Kshetarpal) Judge January 01, 2024 "DK"

Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2024.01.01 13:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document