Satnam v. State Of Punjab And Another
0
IN TH HE HIGH COURT FOR THE E STATES OF PUNJAB AND HANDIGARH HARYANA AT CH ))* +, ,-
23/3
04#0#) ))4
### 3 .// /
###/5 /
'
!"
# $% &'"
'
& Mr.
+,% -. ( &( $#
/(# #'(
' "0 0 !
1
!2- 3 !5 (#' 4
%( # " "- /*61* !"#$% -
&#' (# (%(
/ ( ( # #' ( # #' ( # # ' %( ( % %( / ( & &# ('% %(. && '%%( )&..(& ' *& #' ( # (% ( & & (( ( (#
) ) %( ##
)
$ . ( # .% ( ; . # #' ( .(( #' % (
( %(% % ( $ % ( %(
!%% ##& & ( %
-% (& (8 8%(#' . 1!
##& (& & .# #0 .
(% %1
-#( & # (#(% (( (# & %& (.' # 3 ( # & & . (. 5
9 #( (Rohi 008 Crl. J. 2561. it Kumar Vs. State of Delhi : 20 :
(% 1!
1
& .#0 1:
! (%& ( !
1!
! & & . #0 3
1!
)&. %'
'(!1'( ( + 1
! &
6
(( ( . !
1!
However, w while adjourning g the case to 01.05.2023, the le earned trial Court failed to cons sider the fact tha at .3 %#'%('+ ( (%&# (#(#& & (# (% (( & !1 ' 9 3 # % % #
!"
# $$ <
( %.( . (%& .%(( & .&( &((# - ( 2 5
(# (%# (#' %(( &.& ' = % # 3 % ( (% & ' %(( &. (' (%#3 %((
/# 25 25 5 2 525
+ .+. & %&#.
. (# (% %(# (. 9 #( (Pawan Kumar Gupta a Vs.
of W.B. : 1973 CriLJ 1368. The State -' .& %#. .& && #. ( ( & %( 1
!2-3
!5 ( #' 4
*
%(# " "- /*61* * "
$ - &#' ( # (% % ( & ( % )&. ( #
& ( & 0 #+ ( '# '(( # 7 "
$ #' ('# ( # # # % + ' #+ ' ##(#'
&&
"#. '((# # # ## (%3( ' # 3( ' ( ( % # ( %
/ (( ( #
%'
$% (((# &( &0%' ( # %#% (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE 04#0#))4
Whet ther speaking/reasoned Yes Whet ther reportable Yes