Rakesh Narwal v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-32835-2024 Date of Decision : January 20, 2025 RAKESH NARWAL -PETITIONER V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS -RESPONDENTS

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI

Present:

Mr. Navneet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Bhupender Singh, D.A.G., Haryana.

Mr. Satya Pal Jain, Addl. Solicitor General of India, with Ms. Sai Geeta Shrivastava, Advocate for the respondents No.2 and 3.

Mr. Vikram Jeet Singh, Advocate for the respondent No.7.

*** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL) 1.

Through the instant writ petition, prayer is made for quashing/setting aside the impugned order/Look Out Circular (Annexure P-5) issued against the petitioner.

2.

The learned State counsel has filed reply, on affidavit of Rohtash Singh, HPS, DSP, Traffic, Kurukshetra, which is taken on record. A perusal of this reply reflects that, the petitioner is required for interrogation in FIR No.29 dated 17.04.2019, registered under Sections 323, 354, 406, 498-A and 506 of the IPC, at P.S. Women, Kurukshetra. 3.

This Court posed a specific query to the learned counsel for the petitioner, as to whether the petitioner has ever applied for grant of anticipatory bail, to which an answer was returned in negative by him. DEVINDER YADAV 2025.01.22 09:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CWP-32835-2024 Consequently, the instant petition is dismissed, being a premature motion. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to re-access this Court on the same cause of action, but, after availing the efficacious statutory remedy with regard to the criminal case registered against him. (KULDEEP TIWARI) January 20, 2025 JUDGE devinder Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether Reportable :

Yes/No DEVINDER YADAV 2025.01.22 09:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment