Gaurav v. State Of Punjab
CRM-M No.60879 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.60879 of 2024 Date of decision: 28.01.2025 Gaurav ....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Present:
Mr. Prashant Bansal, Advocate for Mr. Sumit Dua, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sandeep Kumar, DAG, Punjab.
HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral) 1.
This petition has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, seeking anticipatory bail in case bearing FIR No.217 dated 29.10.2024, under Sections 324(2), 304(2), 317(2), 109, 281 of the B.N.S. (Sections 140(3), 331(3), 305 of the B.N.S. added subsequently), registered at P.S. Sadar Jalandhar.
2.
On 04.12.2024, the following order was passed:- "XX XX XX XX
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia submits that, all the allegations are levelled against the main accused Saurav, who happens to be the petitioner's brother. In fact, the petitioner runs a cafe in Shimla and visits Punjab occasionally. The petitioner has been falsely dragged in the present FIR by recording the statement of one victim Amanpreet Singh, who has admittedly taken a loan from petitioner's brother and has not repaid the same. MOHD YAKUB 2025.01.28 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh
CRM-M No.60879 of 2024
3. Notice of motion for 28.01.2025.
4. Mr. Pardeep Bajaj, D.A.G., Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State of Punjab.
5. In the meantime, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation and to appear before the investigating agency, as and when called upon to do so. In the event of his arrest, he shall be admitted to interim bail on his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer. The petitioner shall abide by the terms and conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023."
3.
Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Narain Gaur, at the very outset, informs the Court that the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required. 4.
In view of the statement of learned State counsel, order dated 04.12.2024 is hereby made absolute. The petitioner shall abide by the terms and conditions envisaged under Section 482(2) of BNSS (erstwhile Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973). 5.
The petition stands disposed of.
(HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 28.01.2025 yakub Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No Whether reportable:
Yes/No MOHD YAKUB 2025.01.28 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh