Sunil Kumar And Others v. State Of Punjab And Another
!" !#$%$&'
(
' )*++ , -!%!&
"
#$ ""
$
& '''' + ,./-01 ( ) * + ,)% -(.& -/-.&-&- !
0&0 0&1 0&2 (1.
(13 )45 ! !
0&6 &- (&-.&-&-7 !
8
! # !
59 :(7 ; !
+
&-((&-&159 :&7 & ,)+ ;
<!
:
% &
!
! 8 ;
; !
<
<
;!
4
#
9 9 :&= !
* ;
< < !
;
9 !
!
,) + +
<+ !)
< !
; 1 !! ;
!! < $ < 9 !! 0 !
0 >4
-2(&&-&1 !
> 4
?) +
!
!
4
> 4
?) +
; !
1 ) !
"!
) 4
&1-(&-&2
@
9
& < A :!
!
-.-(&-&2B
<
"; 8 A !
-.-(&-&2
)# * !
(.-(&-&2=
"!
) 4
!
!
!
!
;
; ; ; <
!
!
!
<
) ;
!
! 2 ) !
!
< "!
) 4
6
<
2&. % ;
; 8 4
< *!
<! <
!
<
!
<4
;
! !!
023 % + <
!
;! !
!
!
< %< < / ; ! <!
!
! <
!
! ;
9 !>8 C 4
! !
B.S.Joshi and others State of Haryana &2& 3!-/
1+45-!6!4- %!%
( ; < 4
, ! ! 7408$&2!- +$&93 &2 3!-%:%+ !"4&;<&2& 3!-.
/ 1= ( ;
!
; . >
8 C 4
Gian Singh State of Punjab and another !
""
;
;
< 4
+
,)State of Haryana Bhajan Lal##
""$ 6( :
! "
#
$
%&'
(
"
)*+ , #
- +
,
(
! (
"
( - "
-
(
(
. - -
(-
(
/
(
$
($
(-(
. 0
1
(
.
(- *
(
2
( 3
(
-
(
- -
-
-
.
(
(-
(
(
( -
(
-
-
(
.
# "
#
(
-
(
#
#
-
+ ,
-
#
4
9.
!
! !
0&6 )4<
<
4
!!
!
! < ;
Applying the law settled by Hon'ble Supreme Court in plethora of judgments and this High Court, it is apparent that when the parties have entered into a compromise, then continuation of the proceedings would be merely an abuse of process of the Court and by allowing and accepting the prayer of the petitioners by quashing the FIR would be securing the ends of justice, which is primarily the object of the legislature enacting under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. (-
! + < ;
< ! ! ! ,)% -(.& -/-.&-&- !
0&0 0&1 0&2 (1.
(13 )45 ! !
0&6 &- (&-.&-&-7
!
8
! # !
59 :(7 ; !
+
<+ !
%
<
< !
!
4
; (( ;
( /+ ,1 %$0!%3 @ * ?
D?% @
D?%