← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/59401/2025allowed

Lakhwinder Singh And Another v. State Of Punjab And Another

2025-12-11Mr. Justice Yashvir Singh Rathor2 pages

CRM-M-59401-2025 (O&M) - 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-59401-2025 (O&M) Decided on : 11.12.2025 LAKHWINDER SINGH AND ANOTHER . . . Petitioners

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR PRESENT: Ms. Taanvi Dhull, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Jatin Kundu, AAG Punjab.

Mr. Parvinder Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR , J. (Oral) 1.

Prayer in this petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is for quashing of F.I.R. No.31 dated 01.03.2024, registered under Sections 406, 420 of IPC, 1860 (Annexure P1), at Police Station City Nawanshahr, District SBS Nagar, Punjab and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise. 2.

This Court vide order dated 27.10.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the Trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send his/her report qua the genuineness of the compromise.

3.

Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties had appeared before learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar has submitted report VISHAL VARDHAN 2025.12.11 17:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-59401-2025 (O&M) - 2 - dated 09.12.2025 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4.

Learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5.

In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served by continuing with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant F.I.R. following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 titled as 'Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another' and approved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in (2012) 10 SCC 303 titled as 'Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others'. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and the F.I.R. No.31 dated 01.03.2024, registered under Sections 406, 420 of IPC, 1860, at Police Station City Nawanshahr, District SBS Nagar, Punjab and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed on the basis of compromise, arrived at between the parties.

(YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR) JUDGE 11.12.2025 Vishal Vardhan Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No VISHAL VARDHAN 2025.12.11 17:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document