Kulbir Singh v. Hardeep Singh
%) )% IN TH HE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HANDIGARH HARYANA AT CH +'(,- -. 12+3 4)') '&
52 /0 0
0 2
!"# # " ! + , %
! ' -%
# "$
%&'( ()*%'( "
' "
% %')(,-. " ." 1
3 !" # #4 "$% %&$ )/ 2
' () $" * % ))
"
""
% % 2111110 " ; " ."
% ' " #4
( <
6 2111 1110
0 )
* " "$ //3/)12 )
2
6 211 11110 . = < >" " 7
8 9 "12
2
%"" 0 ' $ * % " $ "
"
"
:
*"
%;
* "
" * "
%4 4%
"
+
"
.
."
, 1)
: "
" " " *
" %
:
!"#4 "
" ) ' 5/ $ * %
%
* ' '( 1
' $ * % 6 " ."
1(
9"
9 ! ? @$ 1/
'5)
!
" #
." ' $ *
%( (% % '
5/ % % "
" ' $ * % ' ."
* *#
0 +
#
$ 9"
9 ' 5/
$ * %
6 6
Sube Singh h and 102, another vs.
State of Haryana and anothe er, 2013 (4) R.C.R. (Criminal) wherein a D Division Bench of this Court has held that even after the convictio on, if the parties h have settled the dispute amicabl ly and have decided to live in p peace and harmon ny, this Court, in exercise of pow wers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
, can compound t the offence.
* + # , - % & % & '( 98' " " "
' $*% * " "
.
" *.-
#/- #
%
& ) 98'
' " 7 8
7 8 " "
$ * % % "
%& &%
* 0 &
9 .
&
" ."
&
& ""
" % * "
.
% %" ." 1
3 !" . "
&
"
' " 4)')'& (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE
Wheth Wheth er speaking/reasoned Yes/No er reportable Yes/No