← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/31596/2025disposed of

M/S Kotla Hydro Power Private Limited Through Its Director v. Punjab State Power Corporation Limited & ORS

2025-10-29Mr. Justice Suvir Sehgal2 pages

CWP-31596-2025 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (119) CWP-31596-2025 Date of decision:- 29.10.2025 M/S KOTLA HYDRO POWER PRIVATE LIMITED ... PETITIONER

VERSUS

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present:- Mr. Anand Chhibbar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Nishant Kumar, Advocate, Mr. Akshit Aggarwal, Advocate and Ms. Swati Vashisth, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Pardeep Sharma, Advocate for the respondent No.1-PSPCL.

**** SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that a petition, Annexure P-15, preferred by the petitioner is pending before the Punjab State Electricity Regulatory Commission, Chandigarh. By making a reference to e-mail communication dated 13.10.2025, Annexure P-17, he submits that petitioner has been intimated that the matter cannot be fixed for hearing till the time the post of Member Legal is filled. Counsel asserts that petitioner has been left remediless. Counsel has invited the attention of the Court to the interim prayer made in the petition as reproduced at page No.168 of the paperbook and order dated 31.01.2025, Annexure P-6, passed by the Appellate KAMAL SHARMA 2025.10.29 17:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.

High Court, Sector-1, Chandigarh.

CWP-31596-2025 -2Tribunal. He has instructions to state that the petitioner is ready to supply the electricity in terms of order, Annexure P-6.

2.

Pursuant to the previous order passed by this Court, counsel for respondent No.1-PSPCL has categoric instructions from Mr. Ashish Bansal, XEN, to submit that the contesting respondent does not have any objection to the said interim arrangement and submits that this arrangement can continue till the time the interim application is finally decided by the Punjab State Electricity Regulatory Commission.

3.

In view of the statement made by counsel for PSPCL, writ petition is disposed of. Interim arrangement as mentioned above shall continue till the decision of the interim application, filed by the petitioner, before the Punjab State Electricity Regulatory Commission as stated by counsel for PSPCL. (SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE 29.10.2025 Kamal Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No KAMAL SHARMA 2025.10.29 17:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.

High Court, Sector-1, Chandigarh.