Hardik Nain v. State Of Haryana

3.

Learned counsel submits that in pursuance of the aforementioned order, the petitioner has not only joined investigation but also handed over his mobile phone and laptop and fully cooperated with the investigating agency. She further submits that in case the investigating agency requires the petitioner to appear, he shall make himself available without demur.

4.

Learned State counsel on instructions from PSI Tejinder Pal Singh, affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioner on 28.11.2025 and 01.12.2025 and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioner is not required for further custodial interrogation.

5.

In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner is allowed and the order dated 27.10.2025 granting interim bail to him, is

CRM-M-59894-2025 -5hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.

6.

However, it is made clear that if the petitioner fails to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to him.