Hoeny @ Honey v. State Of Punjab

1.

The present petition has been filed under Section 482 BNSS for grant of f anticipatory bail to the petitio oner in case FIR No.18 dated 07.03.2024, , registered at Police Station Da aresi, District Ludhiana, under Sections 33 36, 427, 148, 149 and 120-B IP PC (Sections 307 and 160 IPC and Section ns 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, ad ded later on).

2.

On 28.10.2025, this Court had passed the following order:- PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.12.01 18:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

3.

Learned counsel submits that in pursuance of the aforementioned order, the petitioner has not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the investigating agency requires the petitioner to appear, he shall make himself available without demur.

4.

Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Jaspal Singh affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioner and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioner is not required for further custodial interrogation. 5.

In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner is allowed and the order dated 28.10.2025 granting interim bail to him, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

6.

However, it is made clear that if the petitioner fails to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to him.

PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.12.01 18:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.