Gunjan Chaudhary v. Ut. Chandigarh And Others

206-A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-62952-2024 Date of Decision: 27.01.2025 GUNJAN CHAUDHARY ... PETITIONER VS.

UT, CHANDIGARH AND ORS .. RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Gaurav Chopra, Advocate, Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate and Mr. Harmeet Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Manish Bansal, PP, U.T.Chd with Mr. Navjit Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1-U.T.Chd. Mr. J.S.Mehndiratta, Advocate and Mr. Rahul Dhanda, Advocate, for respondents No. 2 and 3. ****** ANOOP CHITKARA , J.(ORAL) FIR No.

Dated Police Station Sections 08.11.2024 Economics Offences Wing Sector-17, Chandigarh 406,409,420,467,468,471, 474,120-B IPC The petitioner apprehending arrest in the FIR captioned above has come up before this Court under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, [BNSS], seeking anticipatory bail.

2.

Counsel for the petitioner submit that they have complied with directions passed by Hob'ble the Chief Justice on 16.12.2024. They further submit that matter stands compromise between the parties.

3.

Counsel for the complainant also does not dispute the aforesaid fact and submit that matter stands resolved between the parties. 4.

State counsel opposes the bail application.

5.

Given above, the present petition is allowed and interim order dated 16.12.2024 is made absolute, subject to further conditions that, in case the petitioner repeats the offence, then State shall file an application for cancellation of bail and if the petitioner violates any of the terms and conditions, then, it shall be permissible for the complainant as well as State to file an application for cancellation of bail.

6.

Pending applications, if any, also stands disposed of. 27.01.2025 (ANOOP CHITKARA ) smriti JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No SMRITI 2025.01.29 15:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment