Rajbir Singh v. Union Of India And ANR

CWP-33805-2024 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-33805-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 08.01.2025 Rajbir Singh ....Petitioner

Versus

Union of India and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER Present :

Mr. Shubham Mehta, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Neha Sharma, Senior Panel Counsel for the respondent(s)-Union of India.

*** HARSH BUNGER, J. (Oral) The instant Writ Petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India inter alia seeking a writ in the nature of Mandamus for directing respondents No.1 and 2 to re-issue the passport of the petitioner.

2.

Learned counsel appearing for the respondent(s)-Union of India informs the Court that the passport of the petitioner already stands dispatched to the petitioner, therefore the present petition has been rendered infructuous.

3.

In view of the statement made by learned counsel appearing for the respondent(s)-Union of India, the present petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous, however, in case, the statement made by learned counsel appearing for the respondent(s)-Union of India is not correct, the HIMANI GUPTA 2025.01.09 14:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh

CWP-33805-2024 (O&M) -2petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of this writ petition. 4.

All pending application(s), if any, shall also stand closed. 08.01.2025 (HARSH BUNGER) Himani JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No HIMANI GUPTA 2025.01.09 14:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh