Raj Kumar And Others v. State Of Haryana And Others

CWP-33642-2024 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-33642-2024 Date of Decision: 13.12.2024 Raj Kumar and others

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present:- Mr. Anshul Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to step-up the pay of the petitioners at par with the juniors from the date when they were promoted as Elementary School Headmaster (ESHM).

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case respondent No.2 is directed to decide the pending legal notice, dated 12.11.2024, Annexure P-10, in a specified period. 3.

Notice of motion.

4.

Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents/State and submits that the pending legal notice, dated 12.11.2024, will be decided by the second respondent-Director Elementary PAYAL 2024.12.16 10:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-33642-2024 -2Education, by passing a speaking/reasoned order in accordance with law within a period of three months.

5.

In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. 6.

Ordered accordingly.

7.

In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioner. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 13.12.2024 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PAYAL 2024.12.16 10:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document