← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRWP/11720/2025dismissed

Najma Khatun v. State Of Haryana And Others

2025-11-13Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-11720-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 13.11.2025 NAJMA KHTUN ....Petitioner

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present:- Mr. M.D. Khan, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Shaveta Sanghi, DAG, Haryana.

.....

RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus directing the official respondents to get the detenue released from the illegal custody of respondents No.5 to 8.

2.

Mr. Sansar Kundu, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondent Nos. 5 to 8 and has filed his vakalatnama in Court today, which is taken on record.

3.

Learned State counsel has filed status report/reply by way of affidavit of Dy. Superintendent of Police, Punhana on behalf of respondentState in Court today, which is taken on record. Copy of the same be supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned State counsel has submitted that the alleged detenue-Farukh Khan is not under any illegal custody and he is residing in his house. He further submits that an FIR has already been lodged and further investigation is going on. MOHIT 2025.11.18 09:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRWP-11720-2025(O&M) -24.

In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition.

5.

Dismissed as withdrawn.

6.

Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly.

(RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) 13.11.2025 JUDGE Mohit Bishnoi i) Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes/No ii) Whether reportable?

Yes/No MOHIT 2025.11.18 09:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document