Suraj v. U.T Chandigarh And Others
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
Date of decision: 15th January, 2026 Suraj
...Petitioner
Versus
U.T., Chandigarh and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA
Present:
Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Arav Gupta, APP, U.T., Chandigarh.
*** MANISHA BATRA, J (ORAL):- Learned counsel for U.T., Chandigarh submits that an FIR has been registered against the respondent No.3.
In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.
Permitted to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
Since the main case has already been disposed of, pending application if any is rendered infructuous.
[MANISHA BATRA] JUDGE 15th January, 2026 Parveen Sharma
1. Whether speaking/ reasoned :
Yes / No PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.01.16 09:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document