Meenu v. Kotak Mahindra Bank

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-61865-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 28.04.2026 Meenu ....Petitioner

Versus

Kotal Mahindra Bank

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present :

Mr. Jitender K. Sehrawat, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Karan Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Nitin Thatai, Advocate for the respondent ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the instant petition as the compromise arrived at and in terms of which, respondent No.2 had undertaken to withdraw the complaint filed under Section 138 NI Act on 06.05.2026.

2.

Ordered accordingly.

(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 28.04.2026 M.Kamra Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes / No Whether reportable :

Yes / No MOHIT 2026.04.28 17:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document