Sandeep And Another v. State Of Haryana And Another
CRM-M-62036-2025
! " "# SANDEEP AND ANOTHER
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER $ %&$ '( ' ) *****
! " #
$ % ' ( ) *
+
! "# )
! ! " # , ----- ( ' )+ , -./ .
" /0 # ,& %
%
23 # 4
& # 56 , // 32723 &
"
387 39 # 6 .02 " ( " 5 : & ;
:
4 " & # : #" 3..22/<
=
>
2.
The above FIR had been registered on the complaint of Upendra Bainsla son of Jatan Pal Bainsla alleging to the effect that 32723 :
& ;
&
# "" ( +,& 66'
"
)
"
" # % "
& ;
% ;
" ?
"
%# "
;!
"
& : & (
"% # "
:
" "
?
""
# ": :: " # & "
:
"
& 0 222@ % "% # +
?
# ""
" # "# #; #
; "
&
"
" $ #
; # " ?
" "
"
&
: # "
"
""
" %
# " " ; "
;
!
# :
" # " & " ?
56 ; &
& &
3 6 ;! !
; ! #
": # : ;: ":
!6 #
: " ; ##" ""
## ; ;
" " 9
2..2/ :
"! # ( " A
B & 5 : !
3 , 0202..2/?
! = " #
!" # $%
' ( )
( / C
"
#" # " !
:+" # 6.
+
! " # )
! ! " appears on behalf of respondent No. 2 and reiterates the settlement and her concurrence to the quashing of the FIR alongwith all the other consequential proceedings. 8 ?
:
" & !
& = " # ;
" 90 # # "
;
D :
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of "Narinder Singh versus State of Punjab" (2014) 6 SCC 466' wherein it was held as under: *+, )-# , &#. $ , )-# / ( (
9 ( ( ' 0 (
/ 123 12 ( ' 3 ( , ' (( ( 4 , ( (
, ( 4 +(
( 4 / ( 5 ( ( (
/ ( (
( 0 ' ' ( 4 3' 3
/ 5, &.6!+
/
( ( , &.6 !+ !" ( ! ' , &.6!+ 4
( ( ( , &.6 !+
3 3 ( % 7 3
( 5
' ( ( 4 ! /
( 0 ' , )-# ( ( / %( !
( (
84 ( ( ( ' (
% ( 5
( (
' , )-# , &.6!+ , (
/ (
(, &.6!+ (
/ (
0 $ "
# : ! # ; & ! #"
&#
&" # ! " # ;
" /0 #1, 23 6 :
# # ( " A
B & 5 : " : ##" !
:; &
;
" "
:
; "
" " "
" ; "
!
"
"
& # " :& ; ;
%" !
" "
8 " ?
## "< > 4 "
: :
;
:
"% & " "!"
" " #
" 6 " :
"% & "
" " #
E
# " ; "
%
" #
"
;
!
& :"
;
; # + " 7 6 !; #
: :
( "A
B & 5 : ! & & " ;
:
* F:
:+"
; ?
# 56 , // 32723 &
"
387 39 # 6 .02 " ( " 5 : "
4 " & # -2-34562 !; # " 3..22/ <
=
>* ;! ;
:
:+" #"
#
"!+ 70 : :
"
#
; G
!
! "#$%
& '#$(%)#* ; # ;
#
" #" #" # ; ,( ' )/ $
+" "# 9 , '
% &@
H @, '
: H @,