Gurnam Singh And ANR v. Krishan Kumar, Ias And ORS

024 (O&M) COCP No.5254 of 20 IN T THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ JAB AND HARYANA ARH AT CHANDIGA 203-U DEEPAK VER Vs KRISHAN KUM COCP No Date of D o.5254 of 2024 (O&M) Decision: 03.02.2025 RMA AND ORS .....

.Petitioners Respondents MAR, IAS AND ORS ....R CORAM: HON

Present:

Mr for Mr HARKESH MA N'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKES SH MANUJA . Randhir Singh Manhas, Advoc cate the petitioners.

. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab.

**** ANUJA, J. (Oral) 1.

Lea arned State counsel representi ing the respondents submits t that payment has bee en released in favour of the petiti ioners.

2.

Lea arned counsel for the petitioner rs admits that factum of receipt t of payment by the petitioner and does not press the e present petition.

3.

Dis smissed as not pressed.

4.

Rul le stands discharged.

February 03, 20 Atik (HA ARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Wh Wh hether speaking/reasoned Yes hether reportable Yes s/No s/No MOHMED ATIK 2025.02.04 09:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment