Rajender Kumar v. State Of Haryana
!"#! $ %&
& % '
( &
) )
))
! "# $!%& ' ( ()*+)(*,*+
$!%& ' ( (-.+,/(*,*+
$!%& ' ( (-0++)(*,*+
1 $ 2!"$ )
))
& +,-.
# &
3 &
45
(
' ( ( )*+)-(*,*+$6
3 &45 .0/,/ ,+ *,*+$
&**&$*/().(7+2 !&&*07$ & $8
( ' ( ( -.+,/(*,*+$6
3 &45 .0/,/ ,+ *,*+$
&**&$*/().(7+2 !&&*07$ & $8
( ' ( (-0++)(*,*+$ 6
3 &45 .0/,/ ,+ *,*+$ & **('$*/2 !&$ & $8
! %& 45$& #&%3 & % % && $ $1 $!
5#
#%
&3 (-. ()99*$ #$&
3 # % #
:
&&&
$&& # ; #%$ $ $ && # && $1 !
$# & 4 3 &$.$.+, &
#&%
!
1 !
# &3 3& 4<$3 # 3
<& $& 4<$&& (!
# #%$&3
3 && (1 $ $ ' ( (007-.(*,*+$ # 3 '( & ' = $ & !?' 3# ' !
07**,*) < '
.+7/)*,*+$# # && &3 *- ., *,*+
$ #& % *.
,.
*,*) = & *.
,.
*,*)3 !?' &3 31
"1. Leave granted.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
3. This appeal arises from an order dated 11.09.2025 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh rejecting the anticipatory appellant in connection with FIR No. 139/2025, registered at P.S. Bilaspur, District Yamuna Nagar.
4. After considering the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, on 27.10.2025, a detailed interim order was passed, which is reproduced below:
"1. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this is a strange case where though recovery was shown from the vehicle in which the petitioner was at the driver seat, no
/ arrest was effected at the time ofalleged recovery. Arrest is sought to be effected after obtaining FSL report regarding the nature of the contraband seized. It has been submitted that in such circumstances,the process of recovery becomes extremely doubtful. It has been submitted that petitioner has no criminal antecedents under the NDPS Act, 1985 and he has been falsely implicated.
2. Issue notice, returnable in six weeks.
3. In the meantime, it is provided that in the event the petitioner is arrested in connection with FIR No.139 registered at Police Station Bilaspur,District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana, he shall be released on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000/9 subject to an undertaking that he shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available for interrogation as and when required by the investigating agency. He shall also submit an undertaking that he will not threaten the witnesses ortamper the evidence."
5. Upon service of notice, the State9respondent is represented.
6. We have heard learned counsel for the parties.
7. We do not find a good reason to vacate the interim order passed earlier. Accordingly, this appeal is disposed of by making the interim order absolute subject to the following conditions:
A) Within three weeks from today, the appellant shall submit bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Trial Court along
with an undertaking that he shall co9 operate in the trial/investigation; and (B) He shall submit an additional undertaking that he will not threaten the witnesses or tamper the evidence.
8. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
.....................J.
[MANOJ MISRA] ...................J.
[MANMOHAN]."
+ <& & % 3 #%1 3
$ $2 $' &
' 6 & & &# (36
)
5 % & (36#
&
-
5 4<$# 3 # .7 ,* *,*)$& #
?
# @ )(
( ))
- = &#%
3 !?' $
& & 1 #
3 4< &3A
- B& &#& 3 !?' &# %*- ., *,*+$#
# & %*.
,.
*,*)$ ' &&3 # & - !&&
# 3 3 $ 3& 3 C 3 & ' C '
1 &
C5
: C2 &&$:
&
! & & 3%$
3& ? & &
= $ ' ?& & & 3 6 %#$ 3 %& % 3 &$ ? 3 &&&# #
/
.,
! & 3 & &&&
+)
)).
& &
Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No Whether Reportable:
Yes/No