Vimal v. Ut Of Chandigarh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH 





   Date of decision: 23rd January, 2026 Vimal

...Petitioner

Versus

U.T., Chandigarh

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Present:

Mr. A.P. Kaushal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Bansal, P.P., U.T., Chandigarh with Ms. Diksha Sharma, Advocate for U.T., Chandigarh. *** MANISHA BATRA, J (ORAL):-
   

 

         

 
 

              

 Learned counsel for the petitioners after arguing for some time, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition at this stage. Permitted to do so.

Dismissed as withdrawn.

Since the main case has already been disposed of, pending application if any is rendered infructuous.

[MANISHA BATRA] JUDGE 23rd January, 2026 Parveen Sharma

1. Whether speaking/ reasoned :

Yes / No



 

































PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.01.23 17:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document