Harpreet Kaur And ANR v. State Of Punjab And ORS

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:- 19.12.2024 
 


 

....Petitioner(s)

Versus



 




...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present :

Mr. Ashutosh Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Lovepreet Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioners.

***** SANJIV BERRY, J. (ORAL) 1.

At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has placed on record the marriage photographs of the petitioners, which is taken on record. Registry is directed to tag the same at appropriate place. 2.

Heard.

3.






 
 
!


" 
 # 

 

 
$

%

 



& '



 


 

 (
 
$
)

*+$ )$ , 
 


 -


-
 

  -
.
..

(
&'







 (
 

$)

*+

  .
 




& '

/(


 

*!$* $ + )
01


2)3

 
$ 2Senior

-2Superintendent of Police, Fatehgarh Sahib,
& 




 
 &
4$




 &/








-
  
5
&


  
 
 
.(

 

$

 




 
 


*!$* $ + )
01


2)3




5
5


1   / $ 6$



/


 $
!$



4.


"

-
7 $
8 
.
-
9  8&-
5

 

"

-



&


2

 
$
*

%

 &/


 
 
5
&





1  
/




5
5$
:$ 
  .

(


  .
 /
;


/ 
&'
 
 


 

5  //.


/ 


-





5


 

 
$ 2
Senior Superintendent of Police, Fatehgarh Sahib

 




 

*!$* $ + ) 01


2)3




5
5


1  
/


  



& '


 


  -
 ( 
;

  




& '$ <$ 


4
&
/


 $ =$ #

/ 









&




'


5
.



.


 

 /

( '





'
(

/
  .


 
5 
& 

'
 
.





 

'
/

-3-   .
.
/-

 5-
 

&
((

// 
'
.>&
03$ *+$


$ (SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 19.12.2024 S.Sharma(syr) i) Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes/No ii) Whether reportable?

Yes/No