Kulwant Kaur Sidhu v. Union Of India Through Its Ministry Of Defence
!"# #$%& ''
& ( ' )')')* ( )' +)'
!"
##### ')'),%#-,.,/",0' $
%
&'( )' *'
+, - ./0 ". / 12
( ( "
"."0 "
$ '
"4 ". /5 6 7"8
12
1
)
( - 5
9
:8 ) - ( ;
( 12 ('- 4"
< ;
+
'
1 )' *'
( (
7
1(
2'
= ". 35 6 7 8)
(- ) -
2 '
"
..
...>7
:
2 3 ."
"..? (& )' ) )' * )'
)' )' *'
1
'(
2
'
7
2 ( $
(2 2
' )
"04 +(
"..@ 5 A
B8
'
7
2
( 1
' ' ;
( "3 "..?
1
(
2 '
(
12 2 (
2 '
7
2 ' '
'
=2 ( ' )
"04
/2
)
3".
(
'
"3 "..?
+
1(
1
)' *'
& ('
1 '
1
12 )'C'
(
1
./ ?@" (
2
2 '
2
6
$ 1
12
12'
(' ' 1 '
= ". 3 =
2
&'(
6+
)12,3 ,45 %#1672" 6 87'7#'8')7,7 $9,2:,%,0". 508 + 5+ 8 @@?5)+80 2'
( 2 1
(
C < ;
"3 "..? 21
)
"04
: ( ' 2
+( < ;
+
'
2 ( @
'
2
'
2 1'
'
+ '
6 + )12,3,45 %#1672" 6 87'7#';6!,6 6152, ny contract of sale (agreement to sell) which is not a registered deed of conveyance (deed of sale) would fall short of the requirements of Sections 54 and 55 of Transfer of Property Act and will not confer any title nor transfer any interest in an immovable property to give such persons cause of action. The relevant paras of the said judgment read as under:-
=0 $
(
'
2
2 $
+ -
(( 5 ?//83)++"0/ 1
2
2 $
2
)
=0 $
)
(1
(D; E ?@/F )+ "?3 $ 2
1'
12
' )
3 )
?@3 )
? $
$
1'
12 1 )
0. $
1' '
2 1('
G H I
H
2I $ H
2I
=$
2'
2
2
( 2
G (1-( J&
- 2 &C E"..0 548)++@ 0F+ G
)
=3
2' ( 1'
'
' (
2 '2
12
'
) '
'
1
' 2 G ((
1
122 21 12
2
5
8 1
2
52 (
K 128 '
((
1
1
"
2 5'
8
2
5
8 K
=0==$
2 2
(( 1
25
( ''
=3 $
8
' $
2
=0 $
((
1
1 ( 2 12
( '
2
1&
(
7.
In view of the aforesaid discussion, we find that the reasoning given by the learned Single Judge does not suffer from any infirmity which would warrant any interference in the present appeal and since the locus standi as such of the appellant herself to prefer these proceedings is high questionable, therefore,
( ')')*
(1 ".
"."0 +)' ),"/ 6- ,
'> L ,
1 -